Data and reports
In production
Occupancy per hour and day, visitor traffic and control fees in one place — so the parking debate becomes a question of numbers.
Parking data in Min Beboer Parkering means dashboards and reports on how the site is actually used: how many spaces are in use across the day and week, how much of the traffic is visitors, and how many control fees are issued and paid. The numbers come from what the system already records — permits, guest links and rounds — and get more precise if you add automatic entry and exit.
See when the site is full and when spaces stand empty. This is usually where an association discovers that the problem is not the number of spaces but a couple of hours in the evening when everyone is home at once.
How many visitors come, when they come and how long they stay. That turns the question of whether the visitor rules are too tight or too loose into something you can settle rather than repeat every year.
Cases issued, paid and cancelled per period. If the count falls after the first months, the scheme is working as intended — enforcement is about freeing spaces, not about writing fees.
An association with several stairwells, courtyards or a garage can see the numbers separately. That matters when the pressure is not the same everywhere and an overall average hides exactly the place that is the problem.
Reports can be pulled and presented when spaces, visitor rules or enforcement levels are up for decision. A proposal with numbers behind it ends in a decision more often than one built on what someone has experienced.
Permits, guest links, rounds and payments generate data without anyone entering anything extra. The basis builds from the day you go live.
Occupancy, visitor traffic and cases are shown per site at the granularity you choose, so you can see both a single busy evening and a trend across a quarter.
After a few weeks the everyday shape emerges: when it is full, where visitors park, and whether there is a standing group of outsiders. These are the questions a board otherwise answers by impression.
Time limits, guest days and quotas per apartment can be changed on a concrete basis — and the next period's numbers show whether the change worked.
Without cameras the numbers build on registered resident permits, visitor permits and the rounds that have been walked. That gives a solid picture of who is allowed to park and how the visitor scheme is used. Actual dwell time and precise hour-by-hour occupancy require automatic entry and exit.
Yes. Data can be read per building or area if the association is set up with that split. It often matters, because pressure is rarely uniform, and an overall 80 per cent occupancy can hide one full courtyard and one half empty.
Reports can be pulled from the dashboard and used as an appendix to a board meeting or annual meeting. That is the typical use: a proposal to change the visitor rules or the quota per apartment is considerably easier to carry with occupancy figures attached.
The retention period is set in the agreement with the association and described on the data-use page. Registration numbers are personal data, so data is not held longer than the purpose requires — which is also why it is worth pulling the reports you will want to look back on.
Once occupancy is known, it becomes visible whether there are hours or days with real spare capacity. That is the precondition for even considering letting spaces to outsiders in quiet periods — but it is a decision the association makes, not something the system does on its own.
See the demo with the dashboard, or contact us for a walkthrough of your site.